In a Tier 1 city, the cost is $800 for a one-time installation fee and recurring charges of $700 per month thereafter. Of that $700, $400 is the monthly local loop charge. An SMB can shop around for bandwidth from IP backbone providers, but it's still stuck with that local loop fee every month.

Can WiMAX Beat That?

An SMB, armed with a tally of its monthly telco service charges for each branch location, can contact a WiMAX provider and determine which services it can eliminate by using WiMAX. It should note where the data center , fiber POPs, and "lit"' buildings are located in relation to the SMB's branch offices.

The WiMAX provider can perform a site survey and determine what equipment the SMB will need to get IP bandwidth via WiMAX instead of the telco's copper or fiber.

An analysis of the SMB's ROI, net present value, cost per day to be on copper, and missed revenue due to limited network services offerings might demonstrate that a wireless approach is more cost effective. In addition, wireless provides overload and backup capacity, a plus in the face of Hurricane Katrina and other potential disasters.

After all, many farmers who live nearby subscribe to a high-speed wireless service provided by Prairie iNet, a small company based outside Des Moines, and they zip effortlessly around the Web.

But to the couple's dismay, their new house, complete with a fishing pond in the back, lies in a wireless dead zone, one that Prairie iNet is not likely to fill soon. Turned down by a federal loan program meant to bring high-speed access to rural areas in 2004, the company is using its limited private funds to expand service to small businesses in the Des Moines suburbs rather than farmers and homes spread among the rolling corn and soybean fields of Iowa and Illinois, a constituency it started serving in 2000.
"There is demand on the commercial side, and we recover our costs quicker on that side," said Neil J. Mulholland, Prairie iNet's founder and chief executive. "And it's too bad, because there are a lot of people out in these areas that really want to get our service, and they will pay the $50. Many of them are paying $70."

Across rural America, entrepreneurs, lawmakers and Internet company executives say they are frustrated with a loan program created by Congress in 2002 to help extend high-speed Internet service to rural areas. Run by the Rural Utilities Service, an arm of the Department of Agriculture, the program has been allocated nearly $3 billion but the agency has lent less than half that.

As of Sept. 30, the end of the 2005 fiscal year, the utilities service had rejected 87 loan applications totaling $1.1 billion and approved 48 loans totaling $770 million. The agency had nearly $2 billion in unused money, and $556 million of that must be committed to new loans before the end of the fiscal year next September or its authorization will expire. Most of the loans carry the same interest rates as United States Treasury bonds, about 4.5 percent.

Critics say the agency's standards are so tough that applicants that have not been profitable for at least two years are rejected if they do not have enough cash on hand to cover a full year's operating expenses. When Prairie iNet applied for a $7.7 million loan in 2003, it was losing money (though it registered two small quarterly operating profits early in 2005). Its investors, among them Liberty Media, said they would chip in $4.2 million in new capital, but the lending agency wanted an investment of at least $7.7 million.